CiDi said:The Hugo connector is located along the display cable.
Hi, There is no HIGO connector located between screen and controler into the M420 (Cortina Bike )
Maybe I Should cut this wire and plug F/M HIGO on the middle.??
CiDi said:The Hugo connector is located along the display cable.
mroupi said:CiDi said:The Hugo connector is located along the display cable.
Hi, There is no HIGO connector located between screen and controler into the M420 (Cortina Bike )
Maybe I Should cut this wire and plug F/M HIGO on the middle.??
mroupi said:CiDi said:The Hugo connector is located along the display cable.
Hi, There is no HIGO connector located between screen and controler into the M420 (Cortina Bike )
Maybe I Should cut this wire and plug F/M HIGO on the middle.??
Kyokushin said:Guys, can anyone with M600 and 46.6 f/w can check the peak power value? 46.7 have 990W, i am looking for something lower.
Kyokushin said:Guys, can anyone with M600 and 46.6 f/w can check the peak power value? 46.7 have 990W, i am looking for something lower.
ornias said:The heat production between 750 and 1000 would be about 5 watt per MOSFET. So I donnot really get why you worry so much. The powertrain is verywell capable of dealing with 1KW peak on the m500.
Waynemarlow said:On my CP240/1 display I can see the bin file in use and the Bafang Go App discusses about how to " update " the firmware via the App which totally dispenses with the need for a BEEST programmer.
Is there anyway we could fool the App from picking up a bin file and updating the motor other than from Bafang directories ?
ornias said:Kyokushin said:Guys, can anyone with M600 and 46.6 f/w can check the peak power value? 46.7 have 990W, i am looking for something lower.
The heat production between 750 and 1000 would be about 5 watt per MOSFET. So I donnot really get why you worry so much. The powertrain is verywell capable of dealing with 1KW peak on the m500.
But maybe our Board Guru could answer it, to give you more certainty @4πr^2, the m500 has half the MOSFETS of the m600. Would that board still be able to deal with 1000w peak load?
That being said:
I'm currently looking for the following firmwares for the m600 (taking into account which might be around from Bafang themselves):
- More 43v firmwares (20A and something lower would be interesting)
- A 48V 20A firmware
- A 36V 20A firmware
4πr^2 said:ornias said:Kyokushin said:Guys, can anyone with M600 and 46.6 f/w can check the peak power value? 46.7 have 990W, i am looking for something lower.
The heat production between 750 and 1000 would be about 5 watt per MOSFET. So I donnot really get why you worry so much. The powertrain is verywell capable of dealing with 1KW peak on the m500.
But maybe our Board Guru could answer it, to give you more certainty @4πr^2, the m500 has half the MOSFETS of the m600. Would that board still be able to deal with 1000w peak load?
That being said:
I'm currently looking for the following firmwares for the m600 (taking into account which might be around from Bafang themselves):
- More 43v firmwares (20A and something lower would be interesting)
- A 48V 20A firmware
- A 36V 20A firmware
It does seem like 1kW (~21 amps @48V, ~28 amps @36V) would be well within the operating range of the 80V/60A rated mosfets. Looking at the datasheet, the silicon is actually rated at 131 amps(!!) and it is the package that limits the rating to a measly 60 amps. Plus, the use of a gate drive chip and the use of a temperature sensor right on the board, the mosfets are likely pretty safe.
http://www.hunteck.com/Datasheets/HGN036N08S_V1.0-061417.pdf
As for everything else... wires, connectors, motor windings, etc... hummmmm, guess we'll have to see. But again, a temp sensor in the motor, so hopefully software would shut down before things get too crazy.
I actually want to do some thermal scans at some point, but it almost seems like the motor might be getting hotter than the mosfet/controller heatsink. If that is the case, then a thermal insulating gasket for the controller might make sense to keep motor heat out!
savaoaknyc said:m800 motor
mroupi said:M420
Kyokushin said:Two latest official Bafang firmwares for 36V (~750W peak - CRX10NC3617i142017.7-28-2230-20200911.bin) and 48V M500 (720W peak - CRX10NC4813i142015.8-28-2230-20210805.bin). Both are day and night in comparison to what comes with engines.
patdam said:Kyokushin said:Two latest official Bafang firmwares for 36V (~750W peak - CRX10NC3617i142017.7-28-2230-20200911.bin) and 48V M500 (720W peak - CRX10NC4813i142015.8-28-2230-20210805.bin). Both are day and night in comparison to what comes with engines.
Do you know if we can use CRX10NC4813i142015.8-28-2230-20210805.bin for all M500 48V ? i have read that they have updated the hardware (the additionnel motor provided to rob). the standard exchange controller received from bafang for mine +-2 month ago have CRX10NC4810i142015.5.
patdam said:thanks for the answer, but i have difficulty to trust software find on web without any official cvalidation of brand
Kyokushin said:patdam said:thanks for the answer, but i have difficulty to trust software find on web without any official cvalidation of brand
You may write to Bafang for confirmation if you have doubts.
I have been asked for latest stronger M500 firmware and received this one and now i am using this on my engine
Kyokushin said:Me too. Only what i saw is from this topicHowever, i have received it from bafang - technically - we know the old M500 is similar to M600, and new M500 rather may be stronger than weaker. It (my M500) 'worked' (but on half of power in due to one shunt resistor less on M500 controller) even when i tried M600 firmware, so i think IF there are some differences then they have no matter.
I have done on 670W peak firmware around 400km so far, and so good. 720W is slightly stronger, i tried some climbing etc, works like charm - its different bike than with stock firmware what we had uploaded by default.
Its up to you mate, all firmware updates are on own risk, but they're saying no risk no fun, no pain no gain![]()