What increase in user input of content is expected from these upgrades, and how do you measure success of this portion of the project funding and enhancements, from the perspective of adding additional content. I reviewed the kb before donating, but was really disappointed to see little or no progress since I pasted some stuff in last year.
I think improving the editor interface 2x could significantly improve the chances that people will contribute.
The existing editor happens to have annoying behavior around features ES article writers want to use, and we found out that's a problem after the fact.
This is also the cheapest part of the job we're looking to do, since i already paid for the new editor integration on another software i'm building. ES is just paying for a graft.
I think article editors getting notifications about comments is about as impactful.
Otherwise they are completely missing those comments with the current design. So effectively, they don't work.
If we had a fluffy budget, we'd design a public high score table for editors, too.
If, for instance, after implementing these enhancements, you see no measurable increase in content, do you continue to invest, or take it off life support?
If the tool works very well for the job, but nobody will use it, it doesn't make sense to fund it further.
The performance optimizations are already done so, unlike wikimedia, there is no technical/cost reason to pull it from the site.
The worst case scenario is that it's a slow grower. The best case is that we end up with something awesome.
Are there statistics on how many times the kb has been accessed since the project went live, how many time content was added or edited, by user, etc.? Anything to show users will/may increase participation or content will increase?
I didn't build any metric collection into it during the last round to know. But even if i did, bots might skew them anyway.
I guess I understand in investing in a nice bookshelf, but in the end, I’m mostly interested in the books. Right now there’s only a pamphlet or two at most.
I get it.
I want to build a fully custom, high durability bookshelf before we start loading it up, and it turns out we needed more for materials.
We've had 3 off-the-shelf bookshelves collapse on us before. That turned out to be a waste of time and resources.
Have you looked into monetization? Like small ads or maybe sponsorships?
Not yet.
The owner of the site doesn't like ads and neither do i. That's a last resort.
Last time we asked for money, it went better than we expected. So we figured we'd ask again.
In previous posts, i explained why a technicality makes it hard to fundraise from a more general audience.
But it may be possible.
I thought i'd ask the people who would benefit from the software directly first.
