Manbeer said:...i got the one with a vlcd5 and 6 pin, hopefully that wasn't a mistake
LeftCoastNurd said:what is the chain like using that adapter, vs the stock 42T ?
beemac said:LeftCoastNurd said:what is the chain line using that adapter, vs the stock 42T ?
Not sure yet - trying to find a decent alloy fsr frame to build up with this my spare motor. Am hoping it will be ok with the chainring on the inside to improve chainline but might rub on the case in lower gears I think. Will be matched with m5100 cassette 11-51T - so should go up the hills ok![]()
LeftCoastNurd said:beemac said:LeftCoastNurd said:what is the chain line using that adapter, vs the stock 42T ?
Not sure yet - trying to find a decent alloy fsr frame to build up with this my spare motor. Am hoping it will be ok with the chainring on the inside to improve chainline but might rub on the case in lower gears I think. Will be matched with m5100 cassette 11-51T - so should go up the hills ok![]()
FSR mountain bikes are challenging, the suspension pivots are usually in the way of the TSDZ2's torque anchor, and the BBs are often way oversize compared with the classic 68mm.
Waynemarlow said:You can use the later style adaptors which have a proper seal rather than a rubber washer. We think it’s at this point that we get the majority of the problems with water ingress along the crank and into the motor as the crank flex’s quite a bit as the bearing is set quite a way into the motor.
We now fit a fully sealed bearing into the chain ring carrier where the seal sits. It has two purposes, to strengthen the crank up as it transfers loading on the crank to the large sprag bearing without the long leverage that normally is there and accounts for some of the breakages some report of the crank. Also by fitting a sealed bearing we stop a lot of the water getting through at that point. Works well.
You can buy 5 hole 110 bcd narrow wide chain rings down to 34T on EBay and thus don’t need the adaptor or if you have 104 chain rings about then the adaptors are as cheap as a chain ring. As to chain line, the offset moves out about 8mm but we have had no problems with the greater offset, it’s surprising how much a modern derailleur can push chains across.
beemac said:LeftCoastNurd said:beemac said:LeftCoastNurd said:what is the chain line using that adapter, vs the stock 42T ?
Not sure yet - trying to find a decent alloy fsr frame to build up with this my spare motor. Am hoping it will be ok with the chainring on the inside to improve chainline but might rub on the case in lower gears I think. Will be matched with m5100 cassette 11-51T - so should go up the hills ok![]()
FSR mountain bikes are challenging, the suspension pivots are usually in the way of the TSDZ2's torque anchor, and the BBs are often way oversize compared with the classic 68mm.
Yea I'm steering clear of anything carbon or post-2012 - sticking to things with 68 or 73mm BSA threaded BBs. I'm ok with making a bracket to connect to one of the pivot points - seems to be the way it's done generally.
Manbeer said:The stock chainline makes me want to puke as a bike mechanic. for now I think I am going to take a 10 speed cassette and remove the two largest gears until I can figure out something better
Been there and done it, and don't bother, the carbon is bonded in as part of the mould and that 2mm fatness is actually hollow.beemac said:Although I do have a 2007 carbon fibre stumpjumper fsr s-works frame spare. The bb is too fat as you'd expect - but I have been looking at it wondering if I can machine anything off the bb without the frame falling apart as it's only 2mm or so too fat on the bottom. It's all aluminium and threaded for a standard bsa bb - but I can't work out how it's bonded to the rest of the frame. It looks to just have a thin layer of plastic around the bottom where I need to machine that doesn't look to be structural - but I really can't tell...
Anyone ever seen how these things are bonded?
No, the main sprag bearing has an indented O ring to seal the spider to sprag bearing. We have been simply putting that original O ring around the outer bearing or a bead of instant gasket or simply waterproof grease if you buy the much cheaper bearing without the indent for the O ring.beemac said:On the seals for the bearing behind the spider - I thought you'd said in previous posts not to worry about seals there and use grease instead? Maybe I'm misremembering....
Waynemarlow said:Been there and done it, and don't bother, the carbon is bonded in as part of the mould and that 2mm fatness is actually hollow.beemac said:Although I do have a 2007 carbon fibre stumpjumper fsr s-works frame spare. The bb is too fat as you'd expect - but I have been looking at it wondering if I can machine anything off the bb without the frame falling apart as it's only 2mm or so too fat on the bottom. It's all aluminium and threaded for a standard bsa bb - but I can't work out how it's bonded to the rest of the frame. It looks to just have a thin layer of plastic around the bottom where I need to machine that doesn't look to be structural - but I really can't tell...
Anyone ever seen how these things are bonded?
And when that repair is done, please just dont overlay carbon, there's a whole process of bevelling and getting the epoxy glue layer at an angle to the fibre to retain the strength of the carbon ( I used to repair carbon back in my younger days )
Manbeer said:Cool, I'm familiar with the Italian one in 30 tooth but I didn't know there were larger ones . I suppose they are a bit expensive, but a normal race face or absolute black narrow wide is like 50 bucks anyway So for a little bit more the cost of admission isn't too steep. I was considering the 30 tooth as well and was worried I would lose too much top end. In the greater scheme of things, maybe if I were to get a 36 V motor and run the 30 T At 48 V that would work tooCE5B43A1-A459-4410-AD52-38F428AE27BC.jpeg
For now I threw on an old 46t Ring on the outside rather than the stock chain guard Since I wasn't in love with the look of it and also I feel like this makes it look a bit more like a regular to prying eyes
Waynemarlow said:No, the main sprag bearing has an indented O ring to seal the spider to sprag bearing. We have been simply putting that original O ring around the outer bearing or a bead of instant gasket or simply waterproof grease if you buy the much cheaper bearing without the indent for the O ring.beemac said:On the seals for the bearing behind the spider - I thought you'd said in previous posts not to worry about seals there and use grease instead? Maybe I'm misremembering....
To remove doubt on the Spider bearing, its a 6902RS. I think you could get a 10mm wide bearing there rather than the more normal 7mm wide, we had a few here of the 7mm as they often fit suspension frames I have had. We put bearing lock on the outer surface to stop the bearing moving through the spider and fill the void between the bearing and base of the crank with waterproof grease.
This photo shows the bearing before pushing it into the spider
Manbeer said:The stock chainline makes me want to puke as a bike mechanic. for now I think I am going to take a 10 speed cassette and remove the two largest gears until I can figure out something better
Actually rotating the motor foward doesn't give any gains, the motor is an eliptical shape, as you rotate it foward the motor profile becomes broader. We have just accepted that its best directly below the BB. Anyway the Chain ring is nearly always bigger than the motor profile and will hit before the motor. You can see the problem here on this straight tube where I thought it would rotate further.beemac said:I will continue my search for an old stumpjumper m5 frame ideally with the nice straight downtube so I can shift the motor forward a bit...