Sr.Agaporni
100 W
That is a nice work, keep it upgrading the info and photos!
Sr.Agaporni said:That is a nice work, keep it upgrading the info and photos!
I've been running multiple motors for years now. No issues what so ever.ElectricGod said:Sr.Agaporni said:That is a nice work, keep it upgrading the info and photos!
I assume you are going to use the same servo signal for both motor controllers, but even then not everything is the same. The motor controllers while being the same model, are still different in small ways such as variations in resistors, capacitors, clock signals, etc. How are you going to keep the two controllers in sync so they don't fight each other? Two motors on the same chain are going to be in lock step with each other. If one controller sees a pulse from a motor sooner than the other controller does for its corespondent motor, then there will times when the motors wont be pulling together. I'm thinking it will create a situation wher ecurrent draw will be higher than expected and the motors and controllers will heat up more.
you may think that. but interestingly it's not true. the challenge is the same with two ICE motors. you may think that you need complicated rpm sensing and ECU programming to synchronize the two. but simply letting them 'pull the same string' works. it even works if you install one motor in the front wheel and the other in the rear wheel. one motor will 'help' the other if they are not 100% the same, and at that time both are working at their same level.ElectricGod said:If one controller sees a pulse from a motor sooner than the other controller does for its corespondent motor, then there will times when the motors wont be pulling together. I'm thinking it will create a situation wher ecurrent draw will be higher than expected and the motors and controllers will heat up more.
recumpence said:My fork arrived today. I was able to lay everything down on the floor to get a feel for the layout of the bike. I may, sometime in the future, build a longer swingarm for it to arrest the wheelie tendency. This bike is not a long layout like my Motoped, yet it is lighter and more powerful with a more centralized center of mass, whereas my Motoped was more forward weight biased. That is why I think this bike may end up being more wheelie prone.
So, I have been knocking around a few different names for the bike and I am leaning toward "Grizzly". The bike is meant to be in the woods, it is ferocious, powerful, and intimidating.![]()
Anyway, I will post pics as I have them.
Matt
izeman said:you may think that. but interestingly it's not true. the challenge is the same with two ICE motors. you may think that you need complicated rpm sensing and ECU programming to synchronize the two. but simply letting them 'pull the same string' works. it even works if you install one motor in the front wheel and the other in the rear wheel. one motor will 'help' the other if they are not 100% the same, and at that time both are working at their same level.ElectricGod said:If one controller sees a pulse from a motor sooner than the other controller does for its corespondent motor, then there will times when the motors wont be pulling together. I'm thinking it will create a situation wher ecurrent draw will be higher than expected and the motors and controllers will heat up more.
macribs said:Matt awesome build as always. Looking forward to see this bike completed. Yellow belly and black fork/swingarm/rims would look fantastic with the carbon fiber parts.
@electric god I think you are overthinking the dual motor setup. The 2 motors will sync just fine, and the motors are so powerful you can take off from standstill by throttle alone even riding up a hill. Don't complicate when you can simplify.
LightningRods said:Nice thinking "inside the box" there, Chief.![]()