New "TSDZ2 Torque Sensor Central Motor"

casainho said:
New MTB bicycles with BB 24mm compatibility with TSDZ2

The guys at the shop told me the BB characteristics are:
- with: 68-73mm
- diameter: 24mm
- type: BSC/BSA

Can someone please help to understand if/howTSDZ2 can be installed?? All new good bicycles has this BB, I hope TSDZ2 can be installed...

The bottom bracket is different (external bearings), but the bottom bracket shell is identical to the vast majority of "standard" shells that would accept an internal bearing bottom bracket (ISIS, square taper, etc). Short answer, this is the shell that TSDZ2 and BBSxx were designed for.
 
Nightdiver13 said:
casainho said:
New MTB bicycles with BB 24mm compatibility with TSDZ2

The guys at the shop told me the BB characteristics are:
- with: 68-73mm
- diameter: 24mm
- type: BSC/BSA

Can someone please help to understand if/howTSDZ2 can be installed?? All new good bicycles has this BB, I hope TSDZ2 can be installed...

The bottom bracket is different (external bearings), but the bottom bracket shell is identical to the vast majority of "standard" shells that would accept an internal bearing bottom bracket (ISIS, square taper, etc). Short answer, this is the shell that TSDZ2 and BBSxx were designed for.
Many thanks for the very clear answer and details.

Thanks for everyone that helped.
 
I'd like to add a temperature sensor to my TSDZ2. The OSS firmware wiki says they installed it without removing the cable in case they want to put the throttle back (https://github.com/OpenSource-EBike-firmware/TSDZ2_wiki/wiki/How-to-install-motor-temperature-sensor#8-wire-throttle-type)

I don't quite understand what that means... Is there a way to connect the temperature sensor without cutting the throttle cable and without removing the controller's potting? The only way the wiki sentence makes sense to me is that they cut the throttle wire, spliced the temperature sensor in, and they'll have to add a bit of wire to reconnect the throttle cable (from the connector) to the existing wire sticking out of the controller. I don't see how to connect it all without cutting the throttle cable and without removing the potting.
 
izeman said:
Hmmm... The more I read the more concerned I become. Now that I have the motor delivered I see what a tiny little motor that really is. Not only compared to one of my DD Crystalyte motor, but also compared to a MAC hubmotor or even a Bafang BBS.
I also now see why this is REALLY only a 500W motor, and nothing more. 750W max for burst. Ok.
But not like the BBSHD that claims 750W and can be run at double the Watts. Or my MAC converted to mid drive that runs 3000W happily (with a modified cooling system of course).
So this motor is really a pedelec motor, something that helps you through head winds and light hills (not mountains). It seems it's not up to mountain biking of any kind. I see broken axles, broken cases, broken gears and burnt windings - even when run under rated conditions.
I bought this because I like tinkering and I LOVE what casinho and others did to the firmware. Looks amazing. And I recommended that motor over a BBSHD to a friend as I thought it's more advanced (which it is because of the torque sensor and advanced software) - I just hope it's up to his expectations and doesn't break after the first ride, and I hope my friend won't be disappointed.
All my fault of course, I should have gone through the several thousand posts and read BEFORE I buy/recommend. Let's keep the fingers crossed and hope that it will all be fine next year - tomorrow! 8) :lol:

that maybe true but the BBSHD is TWICE the cost of the TSDZ2 ie $605 vs $290!
I'm the sort of guy that has been driving for a long time and I much prefer a 1 tonne car with 150bhp as opposed to a 2.5 tonne monster truck with 350bhp that can't go around corners :wink: .....but in the US they think a lot different to the 'light and nimble Europeans' :lol:
Hmm I just had another look and the 750w BBS02 with a 850c is 'only' $385 so you got me thinking now lol :confused:
I still can't believe someone can do 100km in 'mountain conditions' with only a 300w battery supply on this little thing, that's a massive plus right there!
Happy new year! here's some light entertainment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJeWySiuq1I
 
I have a 48v system with LCD3, running V0.19 FW with temp sensor, thermal pads, with 42/53 chain rings, and 8 cogs on the rear, on my "trek touring bike".

I have about 1,000km of trouble free riding. I really like the setup, it feels like riding my racing bike (less 30 years).

I live in Seattle where there are lots of hills, and I typically run at level 2, out of 6 on the flats @ about 32km/h.

I highly recommend this setup for the "real bike" feel. I am looking forward to the P850C, and v2. 0 FW,however right now I don't have a need to upgrade.

I hope to put the same setup on our Canandale tandem this spring, by putting both chain rings on the drive side.

Thanks for everyone's advice and ideas.
 
.but in the US they think a lot different to the 'light and nimble Europeans'

My pedal bike is a 7000 series aluminium XC softtail competition spec. XC bike. frame 1 size small for me, with 26" Mavic wheels and a Rockshox SID fork, carbon bars. Schwalbe Kojak 2" slicks. 175mm cranks. It accelerates, climbs, and handles just fine on the street thank you. I have no intention of screwing it up by adding a motor. IDK what it weighs but it's as light as my budget would allow.
Smaller, lighter ,and cheaper doesn't always equal better. In the case of the VW beetle it did. In the case of the Yugo/ etcetera, not so much. The size of the TSDZ2 is not the issue.
The good handling German cars sell very well over here. VW , Audi, Porsche, and Mercedes. The German Ford (Merkur, Capri) ,and GM (Opels) came and went with the others. People actually pay a premium for them compared to US , and Japanese offerings. Quality is the reason. The TSDZ2 could have been a player over here. It's "features" are appealing. It's quality appalling.

In the US we don't have punitive tax structures trying ot force us to buy smaller vehicles. There are some Corpoarate average fuel comsumption goals to be met. Also a gas guzzler tax if you get it too far wrong. But Rolls Royce, and Bentley don't seem to care do they?
You guys may not know it but our Chrysler 5.7 liter Hemis spend almost all of their time running in 4 cylinder mode.
 
frenchie said:
...I'm the sort of guy that has been driving for a long time and I much prefer a 1 tonne car with 150bhp as opposed to a 2.5 tonne monster truck with 350bhp that can't go around corners :wink: .....but in the US they think a lot different to the 'light and nimble Europeans' :lol:
I'm european as you may see from my avatar :) But I don't want to start a US vs EU debate please. There are ppl who like pedal bike like bikes over here and there, and same goes for motorcycle like bikes.
I was addressing the power rating of this motor. It's important to know that this 500W motor really is a 500W motor and 750W is PEAK only. Future will tell how good it is for my need.
 
Hello everyone! I am looking to build a TSD-Z2 with the 860c display.

Does anyone know when firmware beta v0.20 will be out of 'beta' mode? Since I'm just now jumping in, I figure I should wait since it seems there are a lot of great upgrades and I'm guessing it is happening soon.
 
commutebybicycle.com said:
Hello everyone! I am looking to build a TSD-Z2 with the 860c display. ..........
FW v0.20 is only for KT lcd3 and this beta release is the most stable version.
Also 850C and SW102 has a working version and there is a seperate version for default displays vlcd5 vlcd6 xh18. All these are based on v0.19 (850c >> v0.50). So imho no version currently supports 860c
 
Elinx said:
commutebybicycle.com said:
Hello everyone! I am looking to build a TSD-Z2 with the 860c display. ..........
FW v0.20 is only for KT lcd3 and this beta release is the most stable version.
Also 850C and SW102 has a working version and there is a seperate version for default displays vlcd5 vlcd6 xh18. All these are based on v0.19 (850c >> v0.50). So imho no version currently supports 860c
Follow the wiki to see the installation and configuration instructions: https://github.com/OpenSource-EBike-firmware/TSDZ2_wiki/wiki

and you will see 860C is not supported. If you want it to be supported, then send me as donation a 860C and I will start investigating if it can be supported.
 
itchyfoot42 said:
crazy, I get the same "rumble" in the feet with slow easy pedaling. If I am where congestion will cause it for a period of time I switch the power to off (ran into that riding with a dozen trikes in a parade Saturday - lots of start - slow - stop - repeat).

I have no resistance with the battery off, or with the battery on and power set to off.

I only got coarse rumbling/vibration in cranks once when not allowing the motor to go trough the proper initial calibration of the torque sensor upon startup.
 
casainho said:
Elinx said:
commutebybicycle.com said:
Hello everyone! I am looking to build a TSD-Z2 with the 860c display. ..........
FW v0.20 is only for KT lcd3 and this beta release is the most stable version.
Also 850C and SW102 has a working version and there is a seperate version for default displays vlcd5 vlcd6 xh18. All these are based on v0.19 (850c >> v0.50). So imho no version currently supports 860c
Follow the wiki to see the installation and configuration instructions: https://github.com/OpenSource-EBike-firmware/TSDZ2_wiki/wiki

and you will see 860C is not supported. If you want it to be supported, then send me as donation a 860C and I will start investigating if it can be supported.


The 0.20.0 in the 850 or sw102 would be enough. 😂😂😂

Mfg Michael
 
Not sure if better here or own thread, but...
My VLCD5 just shows all elements on; ie 88.8, 888.8 all graphs and other elements full.
It does this as soon as I plug it in, without pressing any buttons

Does anyone why and how it can be fixed? Ideally I'd like to use it tomorrow.

I got this motor with a XH18.
I've put the XH18 on the bike the VLCD5 came from and leant it to a friend (my plan was always to have that display on that bike, keeping it compact).
I was hoping to flash the firmware and use the 850C display I got for the purpose. However going to do it today, I realised I hadn't clicked that the USBUART and STLinkV2 were different items - so I've only got the STLinkV2 and will need to order the other.

The cable from the VLCD5 had previously been broken, so I had used the plug end of that to attach to the 850C, which is now soldered up.
I've just wired up the spare plug end from the other cable I had to the VLCD5, keeping the colours consistent.

I could flash the motor firmrware today, but not the 850C display - I'm presuming that won't help me get it to work with either display.
 
I switched from the KT-LCD3 to Bafang 850c and speed sensor with Y splitter for lights. The speedometer reading is now about 50% too high according to GPS. Does anyone know what the issue could be?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
esteel said:
I switched from the KT-LCD3 to Bafang 850c and speed sensor with Y splitter for lights. The speedometer reading is now about 50% too high according to GPS. Does anyone know what the issue could be?
That is really strange...

To have it correct, it need to have only one magnet on the wheel and setup on display the correct wheel perimeter. It should work well.
 
casainho said:
esteel said:
I switched from the KT-LCD3 to Bafang 850c and speed sensor with Y splitter for lights. The speedometer reading is now about 50% too high according to GPS. Does anyone know what the issue could be?
That is really strange...

To have it correct, it need to have only one magnet on the wheel and setup on display the correct wheel perimeter. It should work well.
What about metric vs imperial? 1.6x factor
 
Both readings are too high, mph numbers are slightly above km/h numbers on GPS. All other functions are correct. I measured wheel circumference in mm, 2195 for 700c wheel with 42mm tire.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
If you test it without the y splitter cable, are the speed readings different?
Did you only change the displays, or the firmware version as well?
 
obcd said:
If you test it without the y splitter cable, are the speed readings different?
Did you only change the displays, or the firmware version as well?
I flashed the 850c firmware to the new display, but will try a different speed sensor cable. I had ordered two from Aliexpress, not sure if there are different manufacturers or quality issues with that. Maybe I’ll test it with the original sensor first.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Hope you guys can help me on this. I have been struggling a couple of days with my motor.
After hearing creaking noise (for sure not the pedal or crank) on the drive side I decided to open it and see if I could regrease and at the same time check the bearing condition.
The problem is that I couldn't remove the large circlip so no access to the bearing, I could only remove the small circlip, so I just regreased and remounted the whole thing. I discovered that now the axis can slide within the bottom bracket so there's around 1cm play from left to right.

I think the small circlip is not doing its job anymore, I tried to put it right again but it doesn't stop the axis from moving.

Should I just replace the small circlip ?
Or this means the bearing is dead and I should also replace it ?

I could see some brownish liquid around the axis, could be that the bearing is dead and caused the creaking noise.

Anybody has the bearing reference I should order for the drive side ? (It's the coaster brake version by the way).

Thanks a lot
 
el_proletario said:
Anybody has the bearing reference I should order for the drive side ? (It's the coaster brake version by the way).
See the FAQ on the wiki, it has the references for all the bearings.
 
Hiya guys,

I've been using the TDSZ2 for about 5 months now for my daily commute, and did about 4300 kms so far.

Unfortunately today I ran into some trouble: after occasional resistance when pedaling (the crank would jam every few turns, especially when slowing down), it eventually got stuck. Now it's not even rotating anymore. The motorworks fine, and when I manage to turn the pedals it is assisted by the motor. I was thinking it's probably the nylon gear because I did quite some more km's then most here do with the blue gear, but this more like the reverse of the slipping that others report. Can anyone enlighten me what it could be?

Cheers
 
SirJohnDoe said:
Hiya guys,

I've been using the TDSZ2 for about 5 months now for my daily commute, and did about 4300 kms so far.

Unfortunately today I ran into some trouble: after occasional resistance when pedaling (the crank would jam every few turns, especially when slowing down), it eventually got stuck. Now it's not even rotating anymore. The motorworks fine, and when I manage to turn the pedals it is assisted by the motor. I was thinking it's probably the nylon gear because I did quite some more km's then most here do with the blue gear, but this more like the reverse of the slipping that others report. Can anyone enlighten me what it could be?

Cheers
See the wiki information about the issue about of clutch on main gear to understand how TSDZ2 works on this - I would bet on that and not on the blue gear.
The main gear clutch may be blocked.

https://github.com/OpenSource-EBike-firmware/TSDZ2_wiki/wiki/FAQ
 
My torque sensor died so I had to open it up.
This is how It looks now, except that I repaid the broken wires. Still I have same error after assembly. With only the external ring connected I have no error, only with both parts in place.

My questions are:
1. Is there any tutorial explaining how to disassemble the sensor? I had to use the axle and bash it with a big hammer to get it out and I do not like it.
2. Both coil rings on the motor and torque sensor are not glued on the motor or sensor. I do not understand how this can work if the 2 pieces are permanently rubbing against each other.
3. If there is beyond repair(with the wire fixed I do not see why) I can order a new one but still I have no idea how the coils should fit and I do not like the idea to bash a new sensor.

IMG_20191227_165613.jpg


IMG_20191227_165652.jpg


IMG_20191227_170439.jpg
 
Back
Top