Your motor is a 36V type. So nominal it is 350W. In that case 500W is a reasonable max. value with a max. current of 15A.DrewSki said:So how do I calculate the other value? Also, would this value being wrong cause my consumption to go up the way it did?
DrewSki said:Ok, I'll lower the battery power and see if that helps. I had taken off the "Experimental high cadence" mode and saw no difference in consumption. I'd say the Tour mode is a little below what Turbo was on the stock firmware. I saw no difference that I could tell between Tour and Speed, but the new Turbo is more powerful than Turbo on the stock firmware.
Marcoq's last version was v0.19 and stopped further developing of OSFAndrewG said:.... Apologies if I am missing something obvious.
jeff.page.rides said:This is a copy of a reply to an email I received asking about the displays and firmware available for the TSDZ2.
I thought I would share my opinion on the different versions of firmware and the different displays
Hi Lee,
There are four different displays with three different firmware programs available for the TSDZ2. The 860C display only works with V1 but is by far the best display. The 850C display works with V1 and V19 but you can’t read it in the sun. The LCD3 display works with V19 and V20 and is a good display that works in the sun, but has to be disassembled to flash. The VLCD5 is a very limited display that works with the stock firmware and V20. But to change settings or view different information with V20 is very difficult. But the display doesn’t need to be flashed, only the motors need to be flashed and it’s easy and very quick to flash with different settings and works well with V20.
Version 1 is very refined but very complex and difficult to set up and to get working correctly. It does have the potential to be very good at some point down the road, but at this time lacks low RPM power and starting power. It also doesn't work well with a coaster brake, when you stop pedaling it stops but has a high rate of resistance when you pull back to brake, you have to move the pedals back forward 1 inch then pull back again and the resistance stops so you can brake.
It is the only version at this time that works on the 860C which is the best display.
Version 20 is very good, but it could use a few refinements. I believe this is the very best software for any setup.
I hope at some point someone will get version 20 to work with the 860C.
Version 19 is an older version that some people still like, but will never be improved, it does not work with coaster brake motors.
If you could take the good parts of version 1 and version 20 and get them to work on an 860C that would be the very best scenario.
Later,
Jeff
gnistjagaren said:How do I install SDCC and STVP directly to C and not in "program files"?
chri27.5 said:chri27.5 said:chri27.5 said:Elinx said:What do you think. Is it possible that a hardware sensor calibration could help?
imho you can get a lower zero point, but the range you can't change.
Hi Elinx,
I just made the calibration of the hardware sensor, thanks to Mbrusa I was able to read the ADC values, when empty it read 49.2 and 62.1 with the maximum force applied on the crank in a horizontal position, this calibration I did because having a reading field very narrow the engine had a bad performance, it could only be used in sport / turbo.
After calibration the no-load values are 25.0 and 65.0 with maximum applied force.
I highly recommend you to calibrate it because after calibration the engine works perfectly, now I can use all 4 assistance levels without any problem
It is wise only to calibrate if the range between zero- and max load isn't big enough.Adarsh881 said:.....
So I would like to calibrate the hardware sensor by adjusting the two screws. What should be the no load value when reading of the vlcd5 screen? I'm having the "Tsdz2 open source firmware adapted to vlcd5" installed on my motor. Wiki says about the torque calibration that the no load value should be between 100 and 120, but I think that the value you read from a vlcd5 screen would be different. Is that true? And if so what should be the no load value?
Adarsh881 said:Hi.
I did everything what was written in the instruction manual but in the end it doesnt compile/flash when i click the button. Any ideas?
![]()
I took a picture off the screen. sorry...printscreen is not working...
Thank you![]()