deVries
100 kW
Anyone know who has the best prices on the CC HV160?AussieJester said:I believe Burtie had similar disappointment with the monster Turnigy ESC also. Glad i spent the $$ and went with Castle thinking of buying the new CC HV160.

Anyone know who has the best prices on the CC HV160?AussieJester said:I believe Burtie had similar disappointment with the monster Turnigy ESC also. Glad i spent the $$ and went with Castle thinking of buying the new CC HV160.
I was almost getting POed at his Jab's. I have 2 sons serving in the USMC, 1 is abroad, A fathers never ending worry. Untill I read the last hillarious post.It's funny about Todd and his 2003 state victory. Wasn't 2003 the Iraq War? Just about every young person at that time was rushing to get into the war.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Race Strategy
I'm going to be honest about my racing strategy if a 1000 watt race actually can come together. In my opinion Todd is probably a "dirty racer" based on the smack talk he does. I've known people like that and they gain satisfaction by wrecking other riders on purpose. Since I don't want to have him on my back in the race my strategy is to have two bikes entered. My newer and legal bike would go with whatever "jockey" I can recruit. Ideally that person would be 16 years old or so and wants to lead a new generation into the sport. (and take it over) While my "jockey" is off racing towards victory then me and Todd can play "cat and mouse" at the rear of the pack if that's what he has in mind. I'll slow to a crawl if I have to in order to keep him in front of me where he can't do anything. If "Dirty Todd" wants to chase my "jockey" at the front then maybe I chase him and harrass him from behind.
I don't care so much about racing myself, but it would be nice to get the win with someone else (young) doing it. It would be good for the sport.
My best punishment on Todd is to beat him, not myself (that makes it too personal) but with a proxy racer who is everything he isn't:
Young
Athletic / Trim (not fat)
...nothing will get to Todd more than being beaten by youth.
(because it's the one thing he's already lost)
1) Using EV Logix throttelizer limiting current would prevent these ESC burn-outs, but there's no way to switch it on the fly once you're moving to allow for higher amps? Any way to do this?liveforphysics said:Thud's list of burned up controllers on this project, from memory, I could be mistaken on a few.
Turnigy 200a
CC 110hv
Maybe another CC HV110? Or just a loaner controller? (memory unclear)
6-fet infinion modded with big external sink.
6-fet infinion modded.
6-fet infinion.
Motors with very low resistance put some crazy stress on controllers until they get up to speed. This is the reason Jeremy, Moose+myself and others are working on making some proper controller designs. If you're going to pull say 100-150amps from the battery, then the FET stage needs to be able to handle around 500amps or more, because the current limiting stage, and/or partial throttle period is going to have phase currents up this high and beyond at certain points of motor operation. At the moment, the e-bike market really has a gaping hole to fill for controllers that fit this need. I think Thud did about the best a guy can do without building something entirely from scratch, and as I'm learning that hard way, building it from scratch is extremely difficult to get a layout inductively balanced to share loads between parallel FETs evenly.
mwkeefer said:I've played with it extensively...
The purpose in the eyes of eBike designers is quite simple... Although some hub motors are really torquey, most just arent... to that end, you need the most torque when launching from a dead stop and so...
An engineer decides what wattage and determines the motor's torque output based on 1355 / No Load KV * Amps... Then depending on the requirements, for instance a max load weight of 300 lbs the engineer needs to find a way to get that mass (the 300lbs of you bike batteries and motor) moving along quickly... though accelleration takes more power, it only needs that power for a short time... hence Block time is supposed to be the delay in seconds before the limiting kicks in and brings you back to the programmed primary current.
Another bit you may or may not have realized is the purpose of Phase Current and why it is different than Primary or Battery Current...
At lower speeds the controller can multiply the current at the cost of voltage which is only needed (the higher voltage) once the motor is trying to gain speed.... That's why people with 9C usually recommend 2.5 X the Primary Current for this setting and it's the current your phase windings are slammed with on startup... the block time allows for a momentary surge of Primary Current to enable the output which is current amplified (the FETs do this) which in a 26" DD 9x7 Rear (Loaded kV of 10.10 @ 48v - load rating 100KG / 220lbs) - these motors don't have enough torque at 45A to get you moving and thus reduce duty cycle and power handling of the FETs, phases and every other component... then when you approach speed... you will see your current taper down because "An object in motion stays in motion unless acted upon by an outside force".
By comparison - I have found that using Phase Current of lower multipliers of Primary Current like 1.5 X will result in higher top end speeds because the voltage sag is less in the current amplification process.
If your using geared hubs... these are the most fun, here I begin at 1:1 with block time at about 5 (I do run 69A limit on a 9FET shunt soldered and reprogrammed infineon with stock fets and caps) - I can't keep the nose down and my top speed reaches 30+ mph where as when I had the Phase Current at 2.5 the max speed was 27mph... Next I increased the multiplier until my top speed on a flat without wind dropped measurably... This gives me the absolute best combo of slamming accelleration, higher top speeds and better efficiency since the motor spends less time at low inefficient speeds.
deVries said:1) Using EV Logix throttelizer limiting current would prevent these ESC burn-outs, but there's no way to switch it on the fly once you're moving to allow for higher amps? Any way to do this?
2) Why not use a lower rated C un-booster battery pack for stop to start-up to get to initial speed, so the phase current 5 x 30-40amps can't blow the ESC? Then, switch on the main pack with full amps once a safe rpm/speed is reached...
Would either of these methods work satisfactorily?
But, if you focus on this section:Thud said:A lot of what Mike is talking about refers to hub motors in this instance. It is a very differnt animal when compaird to the very low r value of the bigger/faster turning out-runners (I hate calling these rc motors). I am not an expert on controllers by any measure. I am just an ambitious experimentor.
Would this not be an Infineon programming technique that could be used with the 6fet versions to not overload the fets with too many amps from stop to start-up conditions using *outrunners*mwkeefer said:By comparison - I have found that using Phase Current of lower multipliers of Primary Current like 1.5 X will result in higher top end speeds because the voltage sag is less in the current amplification process.
If your using geared hubs... these are the most fun, here I begin at 1:1 with block time at about 5 (I do run 69A limit on a 9FET shunt soldered and reprogrammed infineon with stock fets and caps) - I can't keep the nose down and my top speed reaches 30+ mph where as when I had the Phase Current at 2.5 the max speed was 27mph... Next I increased the multiplier until my top speed on a flat without wind dropped measurably... This gives me the absolute best combo of slamming accelleration, higher top speeds and better efficiency since the motor spends less time at low inefficient speeds.
For example, using a Ping 2C-3C un-booster pack for 10 seconds for stop to start-up conditions every 3-5 minutes or so for city stop/start... that would lead to overheating and cell damage at that duty cycle (not racing) ?liveforphysics said:To address #2. The only way a cell can limit the current coming from it is to have the voltage drop, or fuse/vaporize some cell connection to open the circuit. One option results in cell heating/damage, the other in instant cell failure.
Also, I think you indicated in your previous post that the Phase currents can only increase about 5-6 times. So, if one starts with a lower voltage Ping type or low C battery, and then use this for the stop to start-up condition to get the bike moving. Use an ESC rated for 12s 160amp combined with a Ping 2C at 6s or 8s for just moving the bike from stop to start-up condition... 10 seconds or so to reach the target rpm before engaging the high amp LiPo battery pack, then the outrunner wouldn't be able to overload and blow the ESC fets with the bike already moving?liveforphysics said:This works perfectly to decrease battery currents (which aren't the problem at all), but INCREASES the phase currents.
Here's an idea I want to try out once I have the chance:Thud said:I droped the hall throtle on the drive way & it shattered like glass.I really need to adapt a "real" trottle housing....these china cheapo hall throttles do nothing for my confidence if i need to hang on in a panic situation...any one who knows racing knows your looking for the edge of them panic situation a coupe times a lap.
How makes the "best Hall throttle"
Thud said:(Safe has already said he wont be at the Death race, He is not worrried about his image, its a logistics thing & he is on the "High Road" to creating a perfect world) so I have to wait for the EBRRA or whatever to get organized before I can embarrass myself in a real Ebike race LOL. Hopefully the EBRRA wont have any rules regarding Body Mass Index proportions & I will be allowed to ride.![]()
johnrobholmes said:I was wondering how the two controllers would dual up.
Thud said:Infineion top speed was a 32mph(current limited)on 18cells on a long run on pavement(31 on gravel)